PDF

Keywords

public services delivery
digitization
citizen-centricity
serviceability
state apparatus

How to Cite

Amirova, A., Galy , A., & Baktiyarov , A. (2026). Advancing citizen-centric public service delivery: evidence from European Union countries and insights for Kazakhstan. «МЕМЛЕКЕТТІК АУДИТ – ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ АУДИТ», 70(1), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.55871/2072-9847-2026-70-1-211-221

Abstract

This article examines the advancement of citizen-centric public service delivery through a comparative analysis of selected European Union (EU) countries and assesses the relevance of their experience for Kazakhstan. Against the background of global digital transformation and persistent digital inequalities, the study conceptualizes citizen-centricity not merely as a service design principle, but as an integrated governance capability. The research applies a qualitative comparative methodology and analyzes four EU member states: Estonia, Germany, the Netherlands, and Italy, representing different administrative traditions and models of digital public infrastructure.

The analysis is structured around four interrelated dimensions: (1) the normative dimension, which frames citizen-centricity as a public value linked to legitimacy, trust, and equity; (2) the organizational dimension, focusing on service integration, administrative reengineering, and performance management aligned with citizen outcomes; (3) the data and technology dimension, addressing data governance, interoperability, and the use of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, big data, and cloud computing; and (4) the experiential dimension, capturing citizens’ lived experiences, including administrative burden reduction and perceived benefits of digital services.

The results show that successful EU practices demonstrate coherence across all four dimensions, while fragmented or technology-driven approaches yield limited citizen-centric outcomes. For Kazakhstan, the findings suggest that further progress in digital public services requires stronger value-based governance, deeper inter-agency integration, responsible use of data and AI, and inclusive service design. The article concludes by outlining policy-relevant directions and identifying areas for further empirical research.

https://doi.org/10.55871/2072-9847-2026-70-1-211-221
PDF