Abstract
This article examines training for public servants as a tool for preventing conflicts of interest in the public administration system. The aim of the study is to analyze international approaches to conflict of interest training and determine their implications for improving the public servant training system in Kazakhstan.
The methodological basis of the study is a qualitative comparative analysis of international regulatory and educational materials developed by the UN, OECD, Transparency International, the International Anti-Corruption Academy, and the European Commission's Anti-Fraud Knowledge Centre, as well as an analysis of the national regulatory framework for training public servants in the Republic of Kazakhstan.
The study's results demonstrate that, in international practice, conflict of interest training is viewed as an element of a broader public integrity system and is aimed at developing the professional competencies of public servants, including the ability to recognize conflicts of interest, assess risks, and make decisions in complex management situations. A comparison with the Kazakhstani’s public servant training system shows that the topic of conflict of interest is present in educational programs; however, it is often addressed as part of general anti-corruption and ethics training and does not always receive separate, practice-oriented coverage.
In conclusion, it is noted that the development of conflict of interest training could be linked to a more explicit focus on this topic in educational programs and a focus on developing the applied competencies of public servants.
The study is conceptual and analytical, grounded in a qualitative examination of multilevel international learning strategies employed by global and specialized entities. The paper examines the UN and the OECD as sources of normative and conceptual standards for public integrity, alongside Transparency International, the International Anti-Corruption Academy, and the Anti-Fraud Knowledge Centre of the European Commission as entities that exemplify the practical implementation of these standards through educational formats and competence development tools.
The results are examined in relation to the training and professional development system for public personnel in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The research enables the identification of the characteristics of institutional integration of conflict of interest education within the national context and highlights opportunities for further development, considering international experience.
